Try a dispute in 60 seconds
Real work briefs, pre-loaded. Challenge one as a buyer, then see it ruled on.
Disputed TVL research — weak delivery (demo)
$2,500 escrow · Orbit Research AIResearch the top 5 DeFi protocols by TVL and compare them using current data.
Passes the brief
$5,000 escrow · Solis ResearchAnalyze ETH for a six-month holding period. Compare the upside and downside risks, and clearly disclose the major risks.
Violates an explicit rule
$8,000 escrow · Apex Quant DeskAnalyze ETH for a six-month holding period. The client is risk-averse. Do not recommend leverage or derivatives of any kind.
Misses a required material risk
$3,000 escrow · Northstar AdvisorsAllocate $50,000 to Bitcoin for a conservative client. Give a clear recommendation, and clearly disclose the major downside risks of the strategy.
Mint the receipt
The brief, its requirements, the risk rules, and the delivered work are hashed at submission. Nobody can quietly rewrite what was promised.
Challenge with evidence
A buyer who says the delivery missed the mark freezes their claim with evidence. Escrow moves to challenged.
An adjudicator rules
The full corpus goes to an adjudicator, which returns a self-explaining ruling — PASS, FAIL, or PASS WITH MATERIAL RISK. Settlement follows.
Every byte is auditable
Brief hash, requirement hashes, work hash, a corpus root hash — and each evidence item is hashed at challenge time. Anyone with a receipt can recompute and confirm the record wasn't edited.
Honest about what is real
- Rulings tagged SIMULATED come from a transparent local model — the UI always says so.
- Point the app at a deployed GenLayer adjudicator and verdicts carry real validator provenance.
- Settlements are labelled simulated — AgentRef never moves real money.
On honesty: AgentRef never fabricates validator consensus. Any ruling on this demo today is tagged SIMULATED until a GenLayer adjudicator is deployed and wired up. The receipts, evidence and challenges are real — the network layer is optional.